Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Washoe

Health / Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe High School Students Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide

23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (22.4%), Washoe has a value of 23.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (23.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students Who Experienced Physical Dating Violence

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.8%), Washoe has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students Who Felt Sad or Hopeless

Current Value:
47.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (46.1%), Washoe has a value of 47.1% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(46.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (47.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.2%).
Prior Value
(40.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students Who Got Eight or More Hours of Sleep

24.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (21.7%), Washoe has a value of 24.3% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (24.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)

County: Washoe High School Students who Have Ever Used Cocaine

Current Value:
4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Washoe has a value of 4.9% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students Who Have Ever Used Ecstasy

Current Value:
5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (5.2%), Washoe has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who Have Ever Used Heroin

Current Value:
2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.6%), Washoe has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who Used Vapor Products

Current Value:
20.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (17.5%), Washoe has a value of 20.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (20.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.3%).
Prior Value
(28.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Middle School Students Who Were Not Physically Active

20.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (23.9%), Washoe has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (20.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.4%).
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Adults who are Heavy Drinkers

Current Value:
8.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.4%), Washoe has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Washoe Adults who Binge Drink

19.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.7%), Washoe has a value of 19.9% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (19.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Adults who Drink Excessively

Current Value:
19.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.9%), Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (19.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Adults who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

County: Washoe Adults who Use Marijuana

24.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (19.5%), Washoe has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (24.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.4%).
Prior Value
(19.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

26.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 26.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.4), Washoe has a value of 26.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Washoe has a value of 26.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (26.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3).
Prior Value
(27.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

15.7
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (11.1), Washoe has a value of 15.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (15.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.8).
Prior Value
(18.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
33.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 33.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (25.9), Washoe has a value of 33.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Washoe has a value of 33.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washoe High School Students who have ever Used Alcohol

Current Value:
49.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (46.9%), Washoe has a value of 49.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(46.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Washoe High School Students Who Have Ever Used Marijuana

33.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (30.2%), Washoe has a value of 33.1% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(30.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (33.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.7%).
Prior Value
(37.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who have Ever Used Prescription Drugs

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.4%), Washoe has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (14.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.6%).
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who Have Lived with Someone who Abused Alcohol or Street or Prescription Drugs

35.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (35.1%), Washoe has a value of 35.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(35.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (35.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who have Used Methamphetamines

3.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.1%), Washoe has a value of 3.1%.
NV Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who Use Alcohol: Past 30 Days

21.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (19.3%), Washoe has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(19.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who Use Marijuana

Current Value:
16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.5%), Washoe has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (16.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Middle School Students who Have Lived with Someone who Abused Alcohol or Street or Prescription Drugs

19.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (20.1%), Washoe has a value of 19.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (19.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Middle School Students who Use Alcohol: Past 30 Days

6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.4%), Washoe has a value of 6.4%.
NV Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Middle School Students who Use Marijuana

Current Value:
3.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.0%), Washoe has a value of 3.6% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Middle School Students who Used Vapor Products

Current Value:
6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (5.4%), Washoe has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.9%).
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Washoe Adults with Cancer

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washoe has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
21.0
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (21.8), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(21.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.3).
Prior Value
(21.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
144.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 144.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 171.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 194.7.
NV Counties
(2010-2014)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 144.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (150.7), Washoe has a value of 144.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(150.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Washoe has a value of 144.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (144.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (147.0).
Prior Value
(147.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
12.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.6), Washoe has a value of 12.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Washoe has a value of 12.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3).
Prior Value
(13.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
29.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 29.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (34.9), Washoe has a value of 29.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Washoe has a value of 29.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (29.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.0).
Prior Value
(32.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
20.3
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 20.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (19.4), Washoe has a value of 20.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(19.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Washoe has a value of 20.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (20.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7).
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Washoe All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washoe All Cancer Incidence Rate

429.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 429.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 387.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 439.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 429.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 457.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 489.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,934 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (398.8), Washoe has a value of 429.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(398.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (448.6), Washoe has a value of 429.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(448.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (429.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (429.9).
Prior Value
(429.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
131.5
Cases per 100,000 females
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 131.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 121.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,709 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (115.0), Washoe has a value of 131.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(115.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (126.8), Washoe has a value of 131.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(126.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (131.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (130.2).
Prior Value
(130.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 744 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.1), Washoe has a value of 9.1.
NV Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Washoe has a value of 9.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (9.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8).
Prior Value
(8.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
80.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 80.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 80.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Washoe has a value of 80.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Washoe Colon Cancer Screening

64.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Washoe has a value of 64.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
69.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 69.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 69.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Washoe has a value of 69.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
32.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 32.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,640 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (35.6), Washoe has a value of 32.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.0), Washoe has a value of 32.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (32.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.6).
Prior Value
(33.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
50.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 50.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (51.9), Washoe has a value of 50.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(51.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.3), Washoe has a value of 50.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(57.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (50.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (52.0).
Prior Value
(52.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
70.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 70.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 70.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Washoe has a value of 70.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Washoe Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
48.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.0%), Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (48.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washoe Melanoma Incidence Rate

31.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,137 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.6), Washoe has a value of 31.2 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Washoe has a value of 31.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (31.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.2).
Prior Value
(28.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,859 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.9), Washoe has a value of 11.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Washoe has a value of 11.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4).
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
104.0
Cases per 100,000 males
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 104.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 102.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 120.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,713 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (85.9), Washoe has a value of 104.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(85.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (106.2), Washoe has a value of 104.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(106.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (104.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (105.8).
Prior Value
(105.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe High School Students with Excessive Electronic Use

75.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (76.7%), Washoe has a value of 75.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(76.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Washoe Middle School Students who get Nine or More Hours of Sleep

19.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (18.6%), Washoe has a value of 19.6% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (19.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Middle School Students with Excessive Electronic Use

44.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (53.3%), Washoe has a value of 44.6% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(53.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (44.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (60.6%).
Prior Value
(60.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Clinical Care Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washoe Clinical Care Ranking

3
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.

County: Washoe Health Behaviors Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washoe Health Behaviors Ranking

3
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.

County: Washoe Morbidity Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washoe Morbidity Ranking

4
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.

County: Washoe Mortality Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washoe Mortality Ranking

2
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.

County: Washoe Physical Environment Ranking

Current Value:
14
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 14 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.

County: Washoe Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Current Value:
6
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.

County: Washoe

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Washoe Adults 20+ with Diabetes

7.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Washoe Adults with Diabetes

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (10.6%), Washoe has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
21.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.2), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.6).
Prior Value
(20.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (23.0%), Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Current Value:
83.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 83.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 83.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (81.2%), Washoe has a value of 83.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Washoe has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (83.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.8%).
Prior Value
(83.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
20.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.2%), Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Children with a Disability

Current Value:
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.4%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
NV Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.9%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
NV Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Washoe Persons with a Disability

12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Washoe has a value of 12.0%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Washoe has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Washoe has a value of 3.8%.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Washoe has a value of 3.8%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.6%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
NV Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.9%), Washoe has a value of 6.3%.
NV Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Washoe has a value of 6.3%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Veterans with a Disability

Current Value:
30.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (30.5%), Washoe has a value of 30.0%.
NV Value
(30.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.8%), Washoe has a value of 30.0%.
US Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe High School Students who Did Not Use Any Method to Prevent Pregnancy

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.6%), Washoe has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Washoe Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

22.2
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2015-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 22.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (21.9), Washoe has a value of 22.2 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(21.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (20.5), Washoe has a value of 22.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (22.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.3).
Prior Value
(28.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor

Current Value:
12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.0%), Washoe has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
70.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 70.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 66.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Washoe has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:
85.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (84.7%), Washoe has a value of 85.3% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Washoe has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (85.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.0%).
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Washoe has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:
93.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 93.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (92.4%), Washoe has a value of 93.1% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(92.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Washoe has a value of 93.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (93.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.9%).
Prior Value
(93.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Children without Health Insurance: Under 18

Current Value:
13.0%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.7%), Washoe has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Washoe has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Children without Health Insurance: Under 19

Current Value:
17.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.5%), Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
7.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.9%), Washoe has a value of 7.6%.
NV Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Washoe has a value of 7.6%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (7.7%).
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Geriatric Focus Nurse Practitioners Per 1,000 Population Aged 65+

1.056
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (0.809), Washoe has a value of 1.056 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(0.809)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1.056) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0.830).
Prior Value
(0.830)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (6.5%), Washoe has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Medicaid Enrollment

Current Value:

County: Washoe Medicaid Enrollment

21.2%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (29.3%), Washoe has a value of 21.2%.
NV Value
(29.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Washoe has a value of 21.2%.
US Value
(17.8% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Washoe Medicare Healthcare Costs

$8,102
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value ($9,656), Washoe has a value of $8,102.
NV Value
($9,656)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Washoe has a value of $8,102.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe ($8,102) is greater  than the previously measured value ($7,918).
Prior Value
($7,918)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
128
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 128 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 128 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (109), Washoe has a value of 128 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(109)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (128) is greater and better than the previously measured value (122).
Prior Value
(122)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
88.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (86.2%), Washoe has a value of 88.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.7%).
Prior Value
(86.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washoe Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
57.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (52.0%), Washoe has a value of 57.5%.
NV Value
(52.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Washoe has a value of 57.5%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (57.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (59.1%).
Prior Value
(59.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
20.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (25.5%), Washoe has a value of 20.8%.
NV Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Washoe has a value of 20.8%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (20.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (21.2%).
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,209.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 2,209.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,209.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,703.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 2,209.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2,788.0), Washoe has a value of 2,209.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2,788.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Washoe has a value of 2,209.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2,209.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,912.0).
Prior Value
(1,912.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
79
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 79 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 79 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (57), Washoe has a value of 79 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(57)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (79) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81).
Prior Value
(81)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
89.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 89.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 89.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (88.9%), Washoe has a value of 89.6% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Washoe has a value of 89.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

96.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 96.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 96.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (95.3%), Washoe has a value of 96.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(95.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Washoe has a value of 96.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
91.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 91.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 91.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (91.1%), Washoe has a value of 91.5% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Washoe has a value of 91.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Washoe has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
5.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Washoe has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

73.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 73.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 73.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Washoe has a value of 73.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

45.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 45.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.3), Washoe has a value of 45.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(38.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Washoe has a value of 45.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (45.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.0).
Prior Value
(39.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

116.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 116.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (104.9), Washoe has a value of 116.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(104.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Washoe has a value of 116.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (116.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (118.6).
Prior Value
(118.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
40.6
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 40.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 45.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.3.
NV Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (30.1), Washoe has a value of 40.6 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(30.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (40.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.9).
Prior Value
(37.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.0%), Washoe has a value of 12.0%.
NV Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Washoe has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Washoe Cholesterol Test History

82.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 82.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 82.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Washoe has a value of 82.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
31.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Washoe has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Washoe High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
36.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 36.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 36.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Washoe has a value of 36.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (63.0%), Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
55.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 59.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (60.0%), Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (55.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.0%), Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

13.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.3), Washoe has a value of 13.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Washoe has a value of 13.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6).
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Combined 7-Vaccine Series Coverage: Children 19-35 Months

75.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (68.6%), Washoe has a value of 75.9% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(68.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (73.9%), Washoe has a value of 75.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.9% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (75.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (76.8%).
Prior Value
(76.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
1.4
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.4.
NV Counties
(Feb 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (0.4), Washoe has a value of 1.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(0.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Washoe has a value of 1.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.4).
Prior Value
(0.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
5.97
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.97 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.21 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.36.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.97 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (4.40), Washoe has a value of 5.97 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(4.40)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Washoe has a value of 5.97 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.97) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.54).
Prior Value
(6.54)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (41.0%), Washoe has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Washoe has a value of 50.0%.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (50.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.0%).
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe HIV Rate Per 100,000 Population

Current Value:
5.4
Rate per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.6), Washoe has a value of 5.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8), Washoe has a value of 5.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.9).
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Influenza Hospitalizations Per 100,000 Population

90.7
Rate per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (17.5), Washoe has a value of 90.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5), Washoe has a value of 90.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (90.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (30.5).
Prior Value
(30.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Trends

Current Value:
2.1%
Weekly percentage average
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
67.5%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 67.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 67.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (67.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.5%).
Prior Value
(67.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Salmonellosis Rate Per 100,000 Population

Current Value:
4.0
Rate per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.1), Washoe has a value of 4.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3), Washoe has a value of 4.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.4).
Prior Value
(6.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Stage 3 HIV (Formerly Known as AIDS) Rate Per 100,000 Population

3.2
Rate per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.5), Washoe has a value of 3.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8), Washoe has a value of 3.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.9).
Prior Value
(2.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Tuberculosis Rate Per 100,000 Population

Current Value:
1.2
Rate per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.9), Washoe has a value of 1.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.9), Washoe has a value of 1.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.4).
Prior Value
(1.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:
8.1%
(2015-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (8.7%), Washoe has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Washoe has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Washoe Infant Mortality Rate

6.4
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2015-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (5.7), Washoe has a value of 6.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.9), Washoe has a value of 6.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.5).
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washoe Low Birth Weight Babies

Current Value:

County: Washoe Low Birth Weight Babies

8.9%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (9.2%), Washoe has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Washoe has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Percent Born Preterm (less than 37 completed weeks of gestation)

10.2%
Percent of live births
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (10.8%), Washoe has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Washoe has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Percent of Women Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester

59.8%
Percentage of women
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (73.9%), Washoe has a value of 59.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(73.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Washoe has a value of 59.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (59.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (64.2%).
Prior Value
(64.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Rate of Live Births Among Women Aged 15-19 Years Per 1,000 Females Aged 15-19 Years Population

11.0
Per 1,000 females ages 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (11.7), Washoe has a value of 11.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Washoe has a value of 11.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.7).
Prior Value
(11.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Men's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Men's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Males 40+ Years Who Received a PSA Test Within Past 2 Years

31.7%
Percent (%) of males
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (29.5%), Washoe has a value of 31.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(29.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Washoe has a value of 31.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (31.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (29.8%).
Prior Value
(29.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Washoe has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
19.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (19.6), Washoe has a value of 19.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Washoe has a value of 19.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (19.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.2).
Prior Value
(20.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washoe Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.0%), Washoe has a value of 13.0%.
NV Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Washoe has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

County: Washoe Frequent Mental Distress

13.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (15.2%), Washoe has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Washoe has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe High School Students Who Have Attempted Suicide: Past Year

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.3%), Washoe has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe High School Students who Have Lived with Someone with Mental Illness

41.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (39.9%), Washoe has a value of 41.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(39.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Washoe Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
358
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 358 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 147 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 94.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 358 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (251), Washoe has a value of 358 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(251)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (358) is greater and better than the previously measured value (341).
Prior Value
(341)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Middle School Students who Felt Sad or Hopeless

Current Value:
32.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (34.6%), Washoe has a value of 32.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(34.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (32.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32.4%).
Prior Value
(32.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Middle School Students Who Have Attempted Suicide: Past Year

5.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.7%), Washoe has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Middle School Students who Have Lived with Someone with Mental Illness

26.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (26.8%), Washoe has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(26.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (26.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.7%).
Prior Value
(27.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washoe Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.8%), Washoe has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (16.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
5.7
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 5.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.5), Washoe has a value of 5.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.8), Washoe has a value of 5.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.2).
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Washoe Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate

Current Value:
68.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (53.5), Washoe has a value of 68.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(53.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Washoe has a value of 68.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(57.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (68.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (59.2).
Prior Value
(59.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Washoe Alcohol-Induced Mortality Rate

Current Value:
34.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (25.8), Washoe has a value of 34.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3), Washoe has a value of 34.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (34.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.9).
Prior Value
(28.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (28.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(28.3)

County: Washoe Breast Cancer Mortality Rate

Current Value:
21.4
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (24.9), Washoe has a value of 21.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.4), Washoe has a value of 21.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.8).
Prior Value
(28.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Washoe Cervical Cancer Mortality Rate

Current Value:
6.6
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (9.2), Washoe has a value of 6.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.9), Washoe has a value of 6.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.2).
Prior Value
(10.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washoe Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rate

Current Value:
18.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (17.9), Washoe has a value of 18.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3), Washoe has a value of 18.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (18.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.9).
Prior Value
(11.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Washoe Firearm Fatalities Per 100,000 Population

Current Value:
20.5
Rate per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (19.8), Washoe has a value of 20.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2), Washoe has a value of 20.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (20.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.3).
Prior Value
(15.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Washoe Intentional Injury (Suicide) Mortality Rate

Current Value:
22.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (22.0), Washoe has a value of 22.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(22.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.5), Washoe has a value of 22.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (22.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.1).
Prior Value
(20.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)

County: Washoe Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Washoe Life Expectancy

77.3
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (77.0), Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(77.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washoe Lung Cancer Mortality Rate

Current Value:
32.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (34.4), Washoe has a value of 32.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.6), Washoe has a value of 32.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (32.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.6).
Prior Value
(34.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Washoe Mortality Rate Among Children: 0-19 Years

Current Value:
54.5
Rate per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (52.3), Washoe has a value of 54.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(52.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (52.5), Washoe has a value of 54.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(52.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (54.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (59.1).
Prior Value
(59.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Nevada Tomorrow